Sometimes I Can Be a Super Duper Buttinsky
January 5, 2009 · Print This Article
(DISCLAIMER: This is in response to a situation that has nothing whatsoever to do with me; however, thoughts regarding this sitch will continue to nag at at me until I speak my mind. So there. Read it. Or don’t. Whatever. I do understand that my blog is a public forum and that this may cause negative or hard feelings to be directed my way. But whatever. I feel strongly about what is being said. That is all.)
Dear Lady of Questionable Humor Who was Recently Burned by Twitter Tweets:
I’m sorry that because of something you wrote in your Twitter stream you had to suffer the indignity of having the police come and check on you and your children. I worry all the time that one of my neighbors will call the police or child protective services because I have a daughter that has the most HORRIFYING, piercing yell—I kid you not—and she has absolutely no qualms about shrieking at the top of her lungs for longer than one would believe is humanly possible if her older brother so much as looks at her wrong. Which he does. A LOT. To have the cops come because someone heard her screaming and thought someone was hurting her would be embarrassing and horrible and scary and did I mention TOTALLY EMBARRASSING?! I’ve tried to explain to her that there are “Good Samaritans” out there who could potentially call the police because they can hear her screaming, but she’s a child… and when it comes right down to it, it’s an impulse control issue and all we can do is work on it. That said, I’d be pissed if someone DID call the authorities, especially without talking to me first, but I would totally understand why. While I’d rather be approached first, I really wouldn’t expect a neighbor to come to my door and ask, “Excuse me, are you abusing your child in there?” Nah. Not many people would be brave enough to take that risk. I’m not saying it’s right. I’m just saying.
That said…
I’m American. I don’t watch Fox news (I don’t watch any network news, actually). I do watch “Bones” and “House,” though, and they are on Fox so sometimes I see news commercials during the breaks, but I don’t think that should count because I am usually getting snacks and such, or spending quality time with my husband and children. And I live in the DC Metro area, which is technically “The South” if you go by the Mason-Dixon line, which I totally don’t because that line of demarcation is ancient HISTORY. But dude. Honestly. If you use Twitter, you have no expectation of privacy, unless you protect your updates. And frankly, I don’t know you from Adam, but after reading back through several of your Tweets, I know more about your battles with bipolar disorder, your strained relationship with your husband, and your discontent with your co-workers (and boss) than I think is entirely necessary. WAY more. Good LORD with the TMI, woman! But I have the ability to, you know, NOT follow you. Or read your blog. Which is cool. If I don’t appreciate your brand of humor, so what, right? In the big scheme of things, it don’t mattah. We don’t know each other. We’ll likely never meet, even if I do ever travel to Canada. It’s a big place. Whatever. My good opinion is nothing to you.
So please don’t misunderstand me. I’m all for emotional honesty. I’m all for snark. I’m all for cutting jokes and whatnot. And I get that you want to Keep It Real. Awesome. Go on and get down with your bad self. You have that right. You have the right to ask all of Twitter if it would be okay to smother your screaming child. Even if you are TOTALLY kidding! Ha ha! I get it. You’re like Michael Scott. You hope to someday live in a world where a person could tell a hilarious Child Abuse joke. I hear you. But sadly, that is not our world. Yet. (Fingers crossed!)
So all the Twitter Tweeters who read your “questionable” Tweet (and the others before it) have the right-—and some “Good Samaritans” would say the responsibility-—to think—perhaps!—that someone ought to make sure that you are not REALLY going to smother your child to get her to be quiet and go to sleep. Because mothers ACTUALLY DO THAT. A commenter confessed that she Tweeted that she wanted to flush her child down the toilet, and asked if that Tweet should have sent alarm bells going in the Twitterdom, too. Well, no, actually, it shouldn’t. Why should it? Because mothers CAN’T ACTUALLY DO THAT. Unless there is some super secret child-flushable toilet out there that only she knows of, but even I cannot willingly suspend disbelief on that one, and I watched ALL SEVEN seasons of “Buffy the Vampire Slayer.” (I know, right?) Nor can you sell your child on eBay. Believe me. I’ve tried.
Wait! That was a joke.
You know, the image of the young mother Rowena smothering her three-year-old daughter in “Mary Jane Harper Cried Last Night” is STILL burned into my memory, and that came out in the 70s. THE 70s! I had nightmares! Didn’t want to sleep with a pillow anymore! Even though my momma was always super nice to me! But still! Hate Susan Dey to this… er, day! So there you go. You have willingly put yourself out there as a parent struggling through mental illness and the challenges of raising a family. So when you say something extreme, like “I want to kill my children,” this will lead to extreme reactions and/or responses. It will. You must have known that when you wrote it. Weren’t you trying to be shocking? Otherwise, a simple “My daughter won’t go to bed and she is driving me CRAAAZY…” would have sufficed. Extreme comments like yours set off alarm bells. They just do. And you can’t control the reaction you’ll get from readers who may not know you very well. Or, you know, at all. If you can’t understand that then maybe you shouldn’t be blogging. Or Twittering. At all. At least not in such a public forum.
Because sure, you have the right to Keep It Real and eschew “bullshit and fake honesty” in your own way. But if your exercise of that right in the public forum—where, again, people who see it may not (and most likely do not) know you personally—results in unintended negative consequences, then it is as Mark Twain wrote– that free speech “ranks with the privilege of committing murder: we may exercise it if we are willing to take the consequences.”
Perhaps instead of complaining that concerned readers should take the time to read back over your past posts and Tweets and figure out for themselves that you were just making a twisted sort of emotionally honest joke, perhaps you could ask yourself to take a few moments before you post something that you know is shocking or questionable and ask yourself if it may be taken in the wrong spirit by other parents or people who just don’t get your brand of humor. Like, “Hey, if I announced to a random crowd at the mall that I wanted to kill my children or asked passerbyers at the grocery store if it would be okay to smother my screaming child, would that raise alarm bells?” If the answer is yes, then there you go. Instant filter. Problem solved. I’m just suggesting that self-censorship is necessary if you aren’t keen on serious backlash for hasty or controversial content you put out there for anyone to read. Unless you WANT a reaction, of course, in which case, just keep on keeping on.
It’s like I tell my children who have inherited my control freak gene: “You can’t control anyone but yourself.” To me, that principle extends to how we present ourselves and who we let into our little space in the blog world. You may not be able to control what other people take away from your writing, but you can control how you present your thoughts and feelings. Raw honesty does not have to be shocking or vulgar. It just has to be real.
Again, I am so sorry you had to suffer the indignity of cops coming by to check on you and your family. I mean that sincerely. That must have sucked SO MUCH.
That’s all I have to say about that. I will now carry on living my life.










…aaaaand I just realized all that was a super long-winded way to say “know your audience.”
Eh.
I need more details. Email me.
This was an excellent post and I for one would call the police if I heard a child screaming in a fashion that may have seemed like they were being hurt. As a matter of fact I have in the past. I also would have contacted authorities if I thought I saw something on a blog or twitter or facebook or what have you that I thought needed some type of intervention.
heh hee….you said DIX-on.
William! Only YOU would find the DIX-on… wait, I was forgetting Nils. (I’ll email you.)
Nicely said, and you know what – yes, abusive posts need to be taken seriously (sadly), in this day and age. How are we to know who is joking and who isn’t?
Now I’m totally curious about this super-secret person, but then, you’ve told enough of the story, I guess. (Unless you want to share further details, which I so wouldn’t mind…)
And William made me giggle.
RC: Truthfully, I have no desire to give the specific parties involved any more public attention (negative or otherwise), because it’s just all a big mess. (But feel free to email me for private deets…)
And William always makes me giggle.
I just think that if someone was really going to ’smother their child’ they wouldnt
1) be on twitter …cause they would be smothering their child
and
2) not ask if “its a crime” in the statement….cause anyone THAT stupid wouldnt know HOW to smother.
I think the worst part of this is the waste of tax money over a damn tweet. I dont know how many times i have said im going to kill my child…
trisha
Trisha: I love your point #1. It made me giggle. Totally true!
free speech “ranks with the privilege of committing murder: we may exercise it if we are willing to take the consequences.”
At least you are being fair and thorough and you understand both sides. : )
GREAT post!
Oh, William made me giggle too, and I really needed it!! ; )
Not really a waste of tax payer money because I am sure the offcier that responded as well as his vehicle was already on duty and on the clock. The only way it would have been a waste is if the town where this transpired had to go out and hire an officer and buy a new squad car for a tweet. That would be a waste. Otherwise it is just a cop doing his job.
Oh and sure there is the argument that the officer could have been out stopping real crimes if he was not distracted by the twitter crime. Like he could have been on Facebook patrol stopping unwanted pokes and preventing people from throwing Turkeys and snowballs and other applications.
If I saw someone leave a bar who looked a little too intoxicated and I did not know that poerson I have a responsibility to either try and stop that person from driving or notifying the cops. The person may not be drunk…but then again maybe they are.
I think the person who twittered about child smothering…read it again as Child’s mothering…is embarrased that it happened. Embarrasment will cause a very harsh response.